A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your locality.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community.
Do you support or oppose the factory establishment?
Explain your position.
Experts from the city council have debated whether a colossal factory should be allowed to construct in the proximity to our neighbourhood. Alongside the arguments from both sides, the sociological discoveries have casted light on the consequence of this proposal in accordance with the gain in job vacancies and the detrimental effects on the environment. This essay will discuss both views and support the construction of this factory, using the examples from these academic work.
To begin with, the increase in job opportunities that are probably available to our residents is intuitively perceived as the upside of introducing the new factory. The central reason of this is twofold, firstly this can alleviate the strain of general livelihood caused by economic downturn and unemployment. Secondly, the production of this factory can foster our societal development. In fact, recent empirical research from the Hong Kong University has established that various business sectors entailing logistic, marketing and accounting, to a considerable extent, would be benefited as service partners of this factory in the construction stage. Consistent with this line of thinking is that extra profits would be generated prior to its launch in the future. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that the emergence of this factory increases the likelihood of reviving our economy.
Although there is a case for bringing revenue to the community, the plausible implication of this factory on our neighbourhood cannot be overstated, in particular the potential discharges that are deemed detrimental to the environment. This is largely because the waste entailing chemical and heavy metal would be emptied into the connecting rivers, which could then beget a seismic shift to the solid composition nearby. For instance, according to an extensive study from the Hong Kong University, the productivity of the agricultural area nearby will probably be halved when the factory operates without any preventive measures. Admittedly, extra facilities could be established to alleviate the matters of these wastes; however, the cost is deemed significant. Seen in this light, the company of this factory should take environmental protection into consideration prior to its construction.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence suggesting that the factory could effectively provide a wide range of position to our local citizen. Given that the company has recognised the ramification, it is predicted that the proposal will be supported by over half of the residents in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-10 | Muhammed_10 | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | tahmeed1993 | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | RockyGagKy | 73 | view |
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 89
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 84
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups.Describe the information shown to a university/college lecturer. 84
- Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance?Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 73
- In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57251908397 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13218426168 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2710041718 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.875 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5625 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15675445162 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562346206752 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300855867779 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961150302526 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213142604735 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.