The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph reveals the change of number of tourists going to and from the UK from the year of 1979 to 1999, whereas the preferred nations of UK holidaymakers are compared in the bar chart.
It is clear from the information provided that the UK witnessed a surge that quadrupled its number of visitors over the two decades, ending at staggering 50 millions in 1999. Likewise, more UK citizens had a tendency to enjoy holiday overseas throughout this 20-year period. In fact, having undergone a stable increase to some 11 millions in 1984, the UK outbound vacation saw a considerable climb in the subsequent decade prior to stabilising at somewhere in the vicinity of 20 millions in the 90s.
Regarding the prevalence among five host countries for their holiday, in 1999 over 10 millions visitors took a break in France, rendering it the most well-received one. Meanwhile, second in terms of popularity is Spain, which accounted for some 8 millions. By contrast, the remaining counterparts such as Turkey, Greece and the US shared a practically identical volume of UK visitors at 3 millions.
Overall, tourism to and from UK manifested a positive development during this period, while the majority of tourists originated in the UK enjoyed their holidays in Spain and France in 1999.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-24 | honza | 61 | view |
2018-07-24 | honza | 61 | view |
2018-07-16 | RockyGagKy | 78 | view |
2018-07-16 | RockyGagKy | 73 | view |
2018-06-12 | Meyli | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 67
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Many people believe that mobile phones cause more harms than the benefits and that's why mobile phones should be restricted?To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons to support your viewpoint. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.Write a report for a university lecturer descr 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, second, so, well, whereas, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01860465116 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92201135377 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623255813953 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1977092167 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18265598592 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769787541473 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358400528786 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111860373837 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019434122301 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.