The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
Given is a graph comparing the global market distribution that the most pivotal mobile phone manufacturer accounted for in the year of 2005 and 2006. All in all, it is evident from the information provided that some striking similarities were found in these two consecutive years.
Nokia was the largest contributor in the mobile phone industry. With its production occupied approximately one-third of the total shares in both years, a considerable growth from 32.5% in 2005 to 35% in 2006 was witnessed in the annual report. Likewise, second in terms of possession of global market is Motorola, in which 17.1% in 2005 and a higher 21.1% in 2006 of global mobile devices were delivered from this brand.
By contrast, an insignificant decline from 12.7% to 11.8% was found in Samsung’s proportion, while both Sony Ericsson and L.G. retained their shares in somewhere at the vicinity of 6.5% in both years. A slump, however, was witnessed in BenQ Mobile. The overall production from BenQ Mobile accounting for 4.9% of global market in 2005 plunged to a low of 2.4% in 2006. The remaining shares picked up by smaller brands stood at a meagre 19.2% and 16.2% in the year of 2005 and 2006 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-18 | Jasmineeee | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | duchoangg24 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | Minh Pham | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | SOBIROV.L | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Tracyabc | 78 | view |
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your locality.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community.Do you support or oppose the factory establishment?Explain your position. 73
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 77
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games. 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 78
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or 4.9% of global market in 2005 plunged to a low of 2.4% in 2006. The remaining ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95566502463 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84542356157 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4056027212 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309569887092 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130129529637 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109446344008 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217272251016 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165092935918 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.