The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
A glance at the table given compares the market share of seven mobile devices manufacturer over the world in year 2005 and 2005. Overall, Nokia dominated the market and BenQ mobile lost significant sales over the two year period.
An inspection at the data reveals that Nokia remained as the most commonly used brand in 2005 and 1006. Numbering 32.5% in 2005, the sales of Nokia further increased for 2% to reach 35% in 2006. Second in terms of market share was others in 2005, when it stood at just below 20%. However, it was overtaken by Motorola in 2006, which sales came to marginally over 21%. In contrast, BenQ Mobile had the lowest market share in both years, with just 4.9% in 2005 and even halved one year later.
The companies with which the sales kept almost the same over the two years were Sony Ericsson, which raise slightly from 6.3% to 7.4% in 2006, and L.G., which sales dipped from 6.7% in 2005 to 6.3% in the subsequent year. Finally, Samsung, although recorded a slight drop in the sale, still had moderate level of market share at about 12%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-18 | Jasmineeee | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | duchoangg24 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | Minh Pham | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | SOBIROV.L | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Tracyabc | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 67
- The chart below gives information about global sales of game software, CDs and DVD or video. 61
- Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages to this.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with?Give reasons for your answer and include any re 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...mpares the market share of seven mobile devices manufacturer over the world in year 200...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59685863874 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11349785116 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591623036649 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6721129159 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341373732998 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145995640891 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106640963182 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251679490542 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950998844517 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.