The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities
and regional centres of Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make a comparison where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the allotment of distinct revenue groups in urban and rural centers of Australia.
Overall, the percentage of the population in the middle-wage group is by far the highest, compared to the figures in the low-income group is the lowest. Besides, the measurements indicate that lower middle and middle revenue groups occupy most of the entire individuals in these two different areas.
In cities, the percentage of the Middle salary group is the highest, at 35%, while the proportion of people who owned higher income is significantly lower, at 20%. Besides, 30% of the utter population in cities has lower middle income. Nevertheless, only approximately 13% of inhabitants there have a low annual salary.
In regional centers, people in the moderate earnings group are the highest, accounting for nearly 34%, whereas the figures in the middle group are significantly lower, at around 27%. Adjacently, accounting for about 22%, the ratio of people in the low-income group is a bit lower compared to the middle earnings group. Only 15% of the population there have high annual wages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 61
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 40
- The line graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20111731844 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86665677138 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6706664747 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125723567242 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569938845663 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369010136287 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875892007399 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209393916653 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20111731844 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86665677138 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6706664747 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125723567242 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569938845663 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369010136287 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875892007399 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209393916653 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.