The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities
and regional centres of Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make a comparison where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the allotment of distinct revenue groups in urban and rural centers of Australia.
Overall, the percentage of the population in the middle-wage group is by far the highest while the figures in the low-income group are the lowest. Besides, the measurements indicate that lower middle and middle revenue groups occupy most of the entire individuals in these 2 different areas.
In cities, the percentage of the Middle salary group is the highest, at 35%, while the proportion of people who have higher income is significantly lower, at 20%. There is 30% of the total population in cities has lower middle income. Nevertheless, only approximately 13% of inhabitants in cities have a low annual salary.
In regional centers, people have lower middle earnings are the highest, accounting for nearly 34%, whereas the figures in the middle group are significantly lower, at around 27%. Adjacently, accounting for about 22%, the ratio of people in the low-income group is a bit lower compared to the middle earnings group. Only 15% of the population there have high annual wages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | sturdy | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 80
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8368115905 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7548040423 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120035584629 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575394385059 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307379203934 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855365869672 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158855265967 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.