The chart compares the expensive which were made on different five consumer goods in two countries namely France and UK in the year of 2010.the data was represented in pounds sterling.
It is clear from the graph, the expenditure on Cameras in UK was twofold, the figure for France, 35,00,000 and 150,000, respectively. Cars were the most popular consumer goods among people in both countries for 4,00,000 Francs and 450,000 in UK. Besides this, in the term of Computers had slightly more around 370000 in France which was a mere of 350000 in UK.
Further scrutinizing the graph, the uses of books registered more then 4 00000 in UK as opposed to France at just 3 00 000. In contrast, In France perfume expenses were higher then that of UK which was comprised at 2 00 000 for former and 130000 for letter.
Overall, it can be seen that cars were the significant reason of spending in both countries ,while the least activity was spending money on perfumes.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Planting trees is very important for the environment Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns while other says housing facilities should be built instead Do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two period Summarise
- Some people say that E books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Write a letter to a travel agent expressing your dissatisfaction with their facilities due to a problem you had on a holiday 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igure for France, 35,00,000 and 150,000, respectively. Cars were the most popular...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...e which was a mere of 350000 in UK. Further scrutinizing the graph, the uses of boo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...raph, the uses of books registered more then 4 00000 in UK as opposed to France at j...
^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to France at just 3 00 000. In contrast, In France perfume expenses were higher t...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'higher than'?
Suggestion: higher than
...trast, In France perfume expenses were higher then that of UK which was comprised at 2 00 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... In France perfume expenses were higher then that of UK which was comprised at 2 00 ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ant reason of spending in both countries ,while the least activity was spending mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57580645848 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.169297066 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140683249433 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697343973381 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947994169045 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101216776696 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105857711212 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.