The graph compares the information regarding the percentage of people who took preserved food in a decade between 2003 and 2013, in the USA . Data is calibrated in the proportion.
Overall, taking junk food was significant activity in once a week and once or twice a moth; however, on a daily base people took least amount of food in the given period.
In the regarding of 2006, the fast food was the highest popular among almost three frequencies namely, several a week, once a week and a few times a year with 20%,33% and 15% respectively which as approximately 5% more as opposed to other years in the same frequency.As contrast, the percentage of people had experienced higher who consumed readily food in once or twice a month in both years 2003 and 2013 which was comprised a third whereas, only 25% people ate food in 2006.
Further scrutinizing the graph, only 5% people were used to take fast food in every day in a decade. As well as fast food was not taken by never almost same proportion. From 2003 to 2013, almost same ratio of public shared similar interest in junk food in a few times a year at 15%.
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be build in countryside 73
- There are more new towns being built nowadays It is more important to include public parks and sports facilities than shopping centres for individuals to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- You have bought a new camera but when you got it home you found it had some problems You returned the camera and spoke to the company representative a week ago but the camera has still not been repaired Write a letter to the company In your letter Introdu 61
- Farming is the backbone of the country but nowadays many youngsters hesitate enter in this profession Why is this the case and what can be done to avoid it 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph compares the information regarding the percentage of people who t...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage of people who took preserved food in a decade between 2003 and 2013, ...
^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...decade between 2003 and 2013, in the USA . Data is calibrated in the proportion. ...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'took the least'.
Suggestion: took the least
...a moth; however, on a daily base people took least amount of food in the given period. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the highest popular among almost three frequencies namely, several a week, once...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a year with 20%,33% and 15% respectively which as approximately 5% more as oppose...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ctively which as approximately 5% more as opposed to other years in the same freq...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ed to other years in the same frequency.As contrast, the percentage of people had...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me frequency.As contrast, the percentage of people had experienced higher who con...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...s, only 25% people ate food in 2006. Further scrutinizing the graph, only 5% people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...y 5% people were used to take fast food in every day in a decade. As well as fast food was n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shared similar interest in junk food in a few times a year at 15%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56930693069 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58324484374 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.462425293 43.030603864 319% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271435798746 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123541632497 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757789621037 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171029618527 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535700835324 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.