The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart reveals how much money that people in the UK and France spent on five different products in the year 2010, measuring in the unit of pounds sterling.
Overall, the spending on items in the UK outnumbered those in France, except for the category of computers and perfume. In addition, the average amount of money spent on cars was the highest while that for perfume was the lowest in both countries.
According to the bar chart, the figure for cars reached a peak of each country, at 400,000 and 450,000 pounds in France and the UK respectively. Regarding the category of books, the money spent on the UK was higher 100,000 pounds than the expenditure on France, 400,000 pounds compared with 300,000 pounds. In terms of the cameras, the UK’s value was over twofold France’s one, 350,000 as opposed to 150,000 pounds.
By contrast, the amount of money that people in the UK spent on computers and perfume was lower than that in France. In detail, the spending on computers was higher in France, nearly 400,000 in comparison with 350,000 pounds in the UK. Regarding the category of perfume, the French consumed 200,000 pounds while the figure for British was approximately 140,000 pounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The table compares the percentage of mobile phone owners using their phone features from 2006 to 2010 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 87
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- The maps show the changes of a community center 10 years ago and until the present 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92156862745 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49917325815 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475490196078 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.3425901208 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0439791135994 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219283276563 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285018160339 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0351517883456 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320341239065 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.