The given chart compares the cost of the consumption of goods in the UK and France in 2010.
Overall, cars were the most consumed goods in the two countries, whereas perfume was the least consumed. An interesting point is that more people in the UK bought cameras than in France.
Turning to the details, the sale of cars was 450,000 pounds in the UK, as compared to 400,000 pounds in France. Following that, the figures for books and cars were similar to those for cars. The sales of the former were 400,000 pounds in the UK, while those of the latter were 300,000 pounds in France. However, the figure for buying cameras saw a significant difference in the UK and France, with 400,000 pounds and 150,000 pounds, respectively.
In contrast, people in France were more interested in computers and perfume than people in the UK. A similar amount of sales was 400,000 pounds and 350,000 pounds in the UK and France, respectively. A similar pattern can be seen in the purchase of perfume. People in France spent over 200,000 euros buying perfume, compared to nearly 150,000 pounds in the UK.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 61
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77894736842 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45876801797 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9635654024 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5454545455 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0551736348464 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331989050059 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709096302959 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803480087731 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854899217077 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.