The given graph illustrates the yearly income that three bakeries made during the period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, we are seeing the same trends in two bakeries, Lovely Loaves, and Robie's Bakery, since there have been significant changes in the time period mentioned. In addition, Bernie's earnings were increasing over the course of the year.
Regarding Lovely Loaves and Bernie's Buns, their statistics fluctuated significantly, which means they witnessed both an increase and a decline in the period. Starting at the highest earnings in 2000, Lovely Loaves gradually rose to more than 5000 pounds before falling sharply to approximately 60,000 pounds in 2006. By the end of the period, they had a poor response since earnings had decreased significantly to over 20,000 pounds. Bernie's income started at the lowest end of the scale but ended up in the second position, indicating a rather developed economy.
Turning to the Robies, their earnings were unchanged in the first 5 years, remaining at about 60,000 pounds. This means they had no discernible marks between 2000 and 2005. In contrast, there was a significant rise in the last 5 years. Thus, they had the highest income among the others, exceeding 100,000 pounds at the end of the period.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 84
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, thus, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15609756098 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60620227599 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614634146341 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.812128598 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848495874361 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360684596236 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509194326339 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713145861839 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640862542055 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.