The charts illustrate the electricity production in four countries, namely India, Sweden, Morocco, Vietnam from 2003 to 2008.
Overall, Vietnam and India relied heavily on fossil fuel to produce electricity while Morocco and Sweden were dependent on hydro power. It is also noticeable that Vietnam and Morocco did not use nuclear power for electricity production.
It can be seen that India was the highest country manufactured electricity from fossil fuel. The proportion of electricity produced from fossil fuel in India far exceeded that of Vietnam, with respective figures being 82% and 56%. On the other hand, the shares of electricity made from fossil fuel in Sweden and Morocco were extremely low, which was only 4% and 5% in that order.
Besides, the percentage of electricity produced from hydro power in Morocco was recorded to be the highest (at 95%), followed by Sweden with more than a half. The figure for Vietnam was at 44% while the lowest was India only accounted for 14%. A significant difference can be seen when we look at the percentage of electricity from nuclear power in Sweden and that of India, which was 44% and 4% in that order. Moreover, nuclear power was not utilized in Vietnam and Morocco.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 84
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02450980392 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64274794218 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1653540319 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0890929598232 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483184299842 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391064917206 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776260511197 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395522668481 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.