The chart below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.

The mention bar charts explain the figures for imprisonment in five countries every ten years between 1930 and 1980. The major data are illustrated as the total people who are jailed in the period time. In general, it can be seen that Great Britain that the only country which showed a steady growth with the number of imprisonment from 1930 to 1980. The remaining four countries manifested fluctuations every decades.
First of all, the amount of prisoners in Great Britain was the lowest among other countries which consisted of around 30 people in year 1930. While, the convicts in Great Britain increased rapidly until more than 80 in 1980. On the other hand, there were about 70 people in the Australia’s jail in 1930 and declined moderately until 1950. Then, the number in prison rose slightly to around 70 people in 1970 which had same amount with Great Britain and New Zealand. In 1980, the total people in the prison were about 50 people who were the fewest number of detainees at the time. New Zealand and United State had same total of prisoners as many as 100 persons. The convicts in New Zealand decreased significantly to around 50 in year 1950 and climbed moderately until 1980. The total people who were jailed in United State high enough, showed by the amount were more than 80 prisoners annually between 1930 and 1980. The In Australia’s convicts from 1930 to 1980 oscillated with the biggest number was 120 in 1930.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-09 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 73 view
2019-09-25 michidmaa 89 view
2019-09-10 kulwa 56 view
2019-07-17 Pparth300 78 view
2019-07-17 Sunnydeol 56 view
Essays by user Tyas :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...isted of around 30 people in year 1930. While, the convicts in Great Britain increase...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'amounted'.
Suggestion: amounted
...around 70 people in 1970 which had same amount with Great Britain and New Zealand. In ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 922, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...isoners annually between 1930 and 1980. The In Australia's convicts from 1930 ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in general, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81526104418 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51098777293 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473895582329 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7214062908 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2307692308 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27024416568 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104903837112 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142363818382 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281898538081 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155710721628 0.0819641961636 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.