The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information about the annual GPD of three nations from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, as the chart showed, Tunisia was the country having the highest GDP rate in 2007 at more than 6%. Still, this position dramatically changed when Japan had the most robust economy in the final year.
Tunisia initially had the highest rate with over 6%, which was double that of Ecuador and nearly threefold that of Japan. From 2008 till the end of the period, Tunisia's GDP growth witnessed a significant downward trend from about 4.5% to 3%. During this time, there was a dramatic change in Japan's annual rate when it gradually increased nearly threefold by 2010 since the first year of the period. For more details, the Japanese reached a double rate by 2008. This trend continued into 2009 when this nation's growth was over 5%, exceeded that of Tunisia, and was nearly fivefold that of Ecuador.
Turning to Ecuador, it started as a middle-level country in the economy in 2007, then became the leader of two other countries when its GDP growth reached the highest one at nearly 5% in 2008. However, this nation saw a remarkable decrease of almost 4% in 2009; then its figure increased slightly to over 2% in 2010.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What do you think can be done to solve this problem 56
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 56
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...his trend continued into 2009 when this nations growth was over 5 exceeded that of Tuni...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58767772512 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31828654518 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511848341232 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 211.0 22.4926829268 938% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 968.0 112.824112599 858% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 211.0 22.9334400587 920% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 31.0 5.23603664747 592% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155568210008 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155568210008 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123764592313 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480134474275 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 105.7 13.2329268293 799% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -117.31 61.2550243902 -192% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 82.0 10.3012195122 796% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.82 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.32 8.06136585366 215% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 86.4 10.9970731707 786% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.