The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The given bar chart illustrates the number of mobile phone sold all over the world by the top five brands, namely Samsung, Apple, Nokia, Lg and ZTE in three years: 2009, 2011 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the global sales of Samsung, Apple and ZTE while the opposite was true with the other two brands.
Samsung was seen a significant increase by about 100 sales from 2009 to 2011 and hit the highest point of 450 in 2013. Similarly, the number of phones sold by Apple went up dramatically from about 25 in 2009 to nearly 100 in 2011. This figure continued to rise up to 150 in the last year. Moreover, ZTE was seen a slight increase from 50 to about 70 during the whole period times.
In contrast, Nokia was witnessed a marginal decrease from 440 to 420 between 2009 and 2011 and reach its lowest point at 250 in the final year. This data was the same with LG. There was a moderate decline in its sales from 120 to 80 over the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | AYUSH BOTHRA | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 73
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 84
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 78
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its sales from 120 to 80 over the period
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30810810811 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08858597634 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1184733079 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187343047197 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690382849089 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737648571924 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116803631836 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757623587482 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.