The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The bar graph illustrate the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands in context of 3 years (2009, 2011, 2013). Overall the consumption of a particular mobile brand was leading the market in the different years.
In context amount with respect to the year 2009, Nokia was the most preferred product which amount close to 450, Apple and ZTE was the least preferred phone brand with almost 25 and 50 respectively, Samsung was 1.5 times LG phone brand with amount close to 250 and LG being 125.
In the year 2011, Nokia was again leading but decrease in the sales as compared to previous year with just 440, Samsung, Apple and ZTE stood up to there name and showed increase in the sales with 320, 98 and 55 respectively, Just like Nokia, LG also showed a decline in there sales from 125 to 98 which is same as apple.
On the other hand in the year 2013, Samsung showed a dramatical rise in their sale with total of 450 leave Nokia behind with just 250, Apple being the third highest with just 150, LG and ZTE were almost same with 80 and 60 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | AYUSH BOTHRA | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 84
- the graph shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 67
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45408163265 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19960689949 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.6013698523 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.6 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225689492313 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166991559947 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156712122152 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16698049189 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140740237245 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45408163265 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19960689949 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.6013698523 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.6 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225689492313 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166991559947 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156712122152 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16698049189 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140740237245 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.