The chart below shows household spending patterns in the two countries between 1980 and 2008.
The pie charts show the information about the percentage of household expenditure in the two different nation. As an overview, the highest percentage of money spent on leisure activities in the UK which replaced by utility bills in the New Zealand.
It is clear from the chart that, in the first year in the UK 23% of the money disbursed on food and drinks which was 29% in the New Zealand. Further, the same some amount spent by both the nations on leisure activities as well as utility bills with 27%. While, only 9% of money splurged on others items in both the nations. Whereas, 15% of the money spent on transport in the UK which increased by 2% in the case of New Zealand.
Moving towards the 2008, the highest percentage of money outlawed on leisure activities and it was half in the New Zealand. In contrast, 13% of the expenses made on food and drinks which further doubled in the New Zealand (25%). interestingly, the similar percentage of amount spent on other with 11% in both the nations. Moreover, the money outlawed on transport and utility bills in the UK as 14% and 28% and in the New Zealand it observed as 16% and 31%.
To sum up, there were certain variations observed in the percentage of money spent by both the nation in the different two years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Veena rani | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | Komalsandhu | 40 | view |
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations betweem 2004 and 2007. 67
- The pie charts below shows the average household exoenditure in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
- The chart below shows the make and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000. 56
- Today there is increase in anti-social behaviour and lack of respect for others. What might have caused this situation? How to improve it? 73
- The pie charts below shows the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year of 2010 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... both the nations on leisure activities as well as utility bills with 27%. While, only 9% ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ties as well as utility bills with 27%. While, only 9% of money splurged on others it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed on others items in both the nations. Whereas, 15% of the money spent on transport in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interestingly
...further doubled in the New Zealand 25%. interestingly, the similar percentage of amount spent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54782608696 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52250363224 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.725279011 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0629408761983 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317708780417 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635861049143 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531972271913 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465639123613 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.