The chart below shows how frequent people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the frequency of American citizens eating in junk food restaurants during the period of 2003, 2006 and 2013.
In general, it is apparent that the percentage of people eating fast food every day, several times per week, once a week and never using the service experienced the same downward trend, whereas the figure for people consuming the food one or twice a month and a few times a year followed the opposite development. Furthermore, the most common frequency in the USA was once a week and once or twice a month.
As can be seen in the chart, there was an inconsiderable difference in the decline between the percentages of people who ate in fast food restaurants daily and those who never ate there. The rate of individuals choosing fast food as their meals several times per week in 2003 was 30%, compared to nearly 33% in 2006, and 27% in 2013.
The most noticeable changes belonged to the figure of citizens buying junk food once or twice a month, with an increase from 30% in 2003 to approximately 34% in 2013. Besides, the growth in the proportion of American people who ate in fast food restaurants was slight, from 13% in 2003 to 15% in 2006 and 2013.
- The chart below shows how frequent people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The maps below show a plan of the city in 1950 and at the present 73
- Some people think that it is effective for students to study in a group at school while others think it is better to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...there. The rate of individuals choosing fast food as their meals several times per w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62910798122 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61282685196 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7982741015 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334429377512 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164038059583 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085254329135 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216093834099 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690246990475 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.