Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree or disagree

In present days, numerous individuals think that studying academic knowledge is beneficial, whereas some argue that vocational skills should be given more attention. From my perspective, I totally agree with the former statement.

It is a common belief that vocational learning should be encouraged because it can bring several benefits. Initially, the tuition fee is obviously more affordable compared to universities. Therefore, individuals living in an unprivileged situation can have a chance to reinforce their skills and knowledge. Another reason is that vocational institutions in many countries usually aim at directly providing lessons relating to techniques such as electricians, constructors, and training learners through practices. As a result, people who graduate from these institutions may have enough practical experience to get a job easily.

On the other hand, it is reasonable to believe that academic programs at universities can play a vital part. The first reason is that lectures and lessons are taught by well-trained and erudite professors or lecturers. Students can not only be educated in the most accurate and qualified manner, but they can also develop a mentality by gaining experience with skilled individuals. In addition, universities usually focus on gradually updating knowledge and innovative facilities such as Internet access, infrastructure and supporting equipment, multi-purpose buildings and departments. They can help learners be able to have the best environment to study freely.

To sum up, the importance of practical lessons provided by vocational institutions is clearly undeniable. However, I believe that academic courses at universities should be chosen by students because of various advantages.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8671875 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28332337767 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63671875 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6789151212 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219350628395 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645500629129 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604417585013 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128618728344 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432891055275 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.