The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant.
The provided graph gives information about how often American people went to fast-food restaurants from 2003 to 2013. It is clear to see that while most the people ate at restaurants once a week and once or twice a month, the proportion of people eating out every day is the lowest, compared with the other groups.
As can be seen from the chart, people having fast food once a week increased from 31% to 33% between 2003 and 2006, after that it experienced a drop to 28% in 2013. In contrast, starting at 30 % in 2003, the number of people eating out no more than twice a month went down to 25% in 2006, followed by reaching a peak at approximately 33% in 2013.
Looking at the chart in more detail, fast food was consumed around 4% every day in 2003 then the consumption rate was declined by about 1% in 2006 and was remained until 2013. Similarly, the percentage of people who have never been to fast food restaurants dwindled below 5% over the given time of period.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 61
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about m 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 89
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43575418994 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43391672357 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.2469270698 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25942358301 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138315963167 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652710064091 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180318828155 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271498921966 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.