A glance at the provided bar chart illustrates the information about the proportion of citizens in the USA who ate at fast food restaurants by six different frequencies from 2003 to 2013. In general, it is clearly apparent that in the periods given most inhabitants in the USA went to fast food eateries once a week or once or twice a month.
Looking in more detail from the chart, people who consumed fast food at restaurants once a week in 2003 were reported at around 30% and decreased by 3% in the next decade. Although the percentage rose slightly at 33% in 2006. Similarly, those who went to the restaurants once or twice a month were documented at 30% and increased at 33% in 2013. However, its figures dropped considerably at 25% in 2006. Following the two types of frequencies above, people who visited the restaurants several times a week ranged from near 16% to 20%. Furthermore, the visitors who spent their few times a year for eating at the fast food eateries were reported from 13% to 15% in the periods. Finally, those who never going to the restaurants or oppositely visiting everyday showed similar percentage at not more that 5% in the three cut off point of the periods.
- The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons 67
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 78
- Some people believe that having sport in schools is a waste of time and resources whilst other people believe that sport in schools is a vital part of education Discuss both these views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and decreased by 3% in the next decade. Although the percentage rose slightly at 33% in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... the restaurants or oppositely visiting everyday showed similar percentage at not more t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65876777251 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71438645055 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3940225575 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224402613254 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938283306088 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848624761064 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210818743208 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615089502737 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.