The graph depicts the percentage of American residents eating frequently in junk food restaurant during10 years since 2003. The most significant facts to emerge from the graph are that the figure for once or twice a month and that for a few times a year experienced an increase while other frequencies witnessed a decrease.
Looking in details, it is clearly seen that there was a growth of once or twice a month figure, rising slightly from around 30 to about 33 -the maximum number in this statistical data. Likewise, a few time a year figure saw a gradual increase to roughly 15 before leveling off at the end of the timeline.
However, the figures several times a week and that for once a week had a similar pattern. Not only did the former climb to nearly 33 in 2006 and afterward witnessed a noticeable fall to approximately 27 but the latter rose to roughly 33 and then declined to 27 as well in 2013. At the same time, the timeline experienced a moderate drop in the proportion of people eating every day and never ate in a fast food restaurant in 2006 before remaining stable at around 2 -the smallest percentage of people who attended to fast food restaurant during over 10 years.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 69
- The bar chart below show the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case ? what can be done about this problem? 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...r in this statistical data. Likewise, a few time a year figure saw a gradual increase to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the smallest'.
Suggestion: -the the smallest
...006 before remaining stable at around 2 -the smallest percentage of people who attended to fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, look, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63849765258 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65178848902 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7720158398 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.142857143 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105712346061 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439133218228 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640861205075 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638189156659 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507220485555 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.