The graph represents how often did American people have fast-food for breakfast in restaurant within a decade, from 2003 to 2013.
As can be seen from the graph, from 2003 to 2006, the percentage of people who have never taken fast-food was reduced to 1%. On the other hand, during the same period, the number of clients using fast-food everyday has fallen by approximately 3%. By contrast, the proportion of US citizens who rarely ate fast-food (few times a year) rose 3% from the starting point. These three segments remained unchanged since 2013.
The sharp changes were shown in the groups, who ate fast-food as a weekly basis and also who visited the fast-food restaurant once or twice a month. The same amount of people of both groups ate fast-food in the year of 2003, 30% respectively, before fluctuated in a decade and ended up with around 27% for once a week group and 33% for once or twice a month group, in 2013.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 61
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all male and female workers by occupation in the UK in the year 2005 88
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 56
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
..., the number of clients using fast-food everyday has fallen by approximately 3%. By cont...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66463414634 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49487130086 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3372615022 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220865059693 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105838751353 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504311856452 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166518133221 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280636627942 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.