The bar chart below depicts the eating frequency of Americans in fast food restaurants during 2003 to 2013. Overall, it is readily apparent that in during that period, most people ate fast food once a week, and only least of them consumed fast food every day.
In detail, in 2003 and 2006 Americans mostly ate fast food once a week, at approximately 31% and about 33%, respectively. Next, both in 2003 and 2006 Americans mostly consumed fast food once or twice a month, at 30% and 25%, respectively. This frequency is then followed by several times a week and few times a year for both 2003 and 2006, at about 17%, 20% (for "several times a week"), respectively, around 13%, and 15% (for "few times a year"), respectively. Lastly, never and every day became the least frequencies for Americans to consume fast food in both 2003 and 2006, at 5%, and about 3% (for "never"), respectively and almost 5% and approximately 3% (for "every day"), respectively.
Meanwhile, in 2013, most Americans ate fast food once or twice a month, at approximately 33%. This then followed by once a week, which stood at around 27%. Next, most Americans consumed fast food several times a week, and a few times a year, at around 17%, and 15%, respectively. Lastly, never and everyday became least frequency for Americans to eat fast food, at around 4% and approximately 3%, respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 56
- The Bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by select the main features and make comparisons when relevant 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nd 15%, respectively. Lastly, never and everyday became least frequency for Americans to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'became the least'.
Suggestion: became the least
...espectively. Lastly, never and everyday became least frequency for Americans to eat fast foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97457627119 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05479969991 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427966101695 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3971630492 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.4 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193920834998 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121580324867 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995292144526 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192335339011 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120207629723 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.