The chart below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time in the year 1982

The table chart provides and information about activities of unemployed people in the UK during their day in 1982.
It is noticeable that about 49% and 21% of women spend their time during house work in the morning or in the afternoon respectively. To compare with men who like more shopping or job hunting in the morning. Moreover, men prefered gardening both in the morning and afternoon and were 14% And 13% in comparison with women whose rates were 2% and 3% respectively to the part of the day. The greatest difference between time spending in the morning or afternoon was a registered in watching TV. It is interesting, that either men or women did not watch TV in the morning, but afternoon about 14% of men and 12% of women were attracted by TV channels. In addition, women rarely drunk or played sports during both parts of the day, while much the same amount of men were self consumed during the morning or afternoon. It is also needs to describe, that afternoon women were influenced by doing nothing twice more than morning women, whereas afternoon men yelded to sorrow three times more than morning men. However, about 8% of men and the same amount of women enjoyed staying in bed in the morning in comparison with afternoon time when only 1% of men and 0% of women did it.
In conclusion, the most preferrable occupation for unemployed men was job hunting in the morning and watching TV or gardening afternoon, while for women the most popular were housework or shopping.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (24 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70114942529 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60726772908 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486590038314 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8528730746 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.7 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796164095858 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492333220188 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773887994803 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111592173825 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109959735965 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.