The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in the five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates percentage change in the average retail price of homes in New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt, and London from 1990 to 2002 in comparison to their market value in 1989.
Overall, in the first half of the period, house prices were down in most cities while other experienced a slight increase. However, in the latter half, house prices began to surge in the majority of the cities except in Tokyo and Frankfurt.
In 1990 to 1995, house prices fell in New York by -5%. Similarly, the prices also went down in Tokyo and London by almost -10%. In contrast, home’s retail value went up in Madrid and Frankfurt by approximately 1% and 2% respectively.
In 1996 to 2002, house prices jumped to more than 10% in London, the biggest increase in the group. A similar trend was also seen in New York and Madrid in which prices went up to 5% and 4% respectively. However, prices went down by 1% in Frankfurt during this period. In Tokyo, although the average price improved by about 3%, it was still below the zero line.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
- The diagram below shows the process of glass making from making new glass to recycling Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, similarly, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67567567568 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48498191847 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0464573205 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255794976495 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111747002532 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624989403437 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166586728151 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309072887285 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.