The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar graph contains data of percentage change in average house prices in five cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with 1989. The striking feature of the chart is a drastic elevation of house prices in London during the second interval of time.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that in the first half period cost of Tokyo as well as London declined to the same extent that was -7.5% whereas the prices of NewYork collapsed by 5%. On the contrary, a number of houses had surged in the Madrid and Frankfurt by approximately 2%.
Moving further, there was a steep increase in the cost of houses in all countries except Tokyo which was 5% behind the rates of 1989. However, the cost in NewYork went up by 5% as contrasted to 1989 which was followed by Madrid. Meanwhile, a number of houses steadily dropped by 1% in Germany.
All-in-all, the inflation surged in the second interval of time rather than first.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 73
- To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school. How true is this statement? Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children? 67
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dropped by 1% in Germany. All-in-all, the inflation surged in the second inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67682926829 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46591125599 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.993420483 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306820694601 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129310925564 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16872557764 0.0843802449381 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173309337574 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20257122685 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.