The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house price in 1989.
The histogram presents data on variations in the median value of homes in five international metropolises during the final decade of the Twentieth Century compared with 1989 base prices. Overall, prices fell in the majority of the sampled cities between 1990 and 1995, whereas they rose in all locations except Tokyo from 1996 to 2002.
Starting with the period from 1990-1995, there was an overall trend of declining property values, with London and Tokyo suffering the greatest losses at -7.5% each, while New York fared only slightly better with a drop to -5%. Madrid and Frankfurt, on the other hand, enjoyed marginal price increases of +2% and +2.5% respectively.
Turning now to the 1996-2002 time frame, the trend had swung into positive territory for most cities in the survey, with relative gains of +4% in Madrid, +5% for New York, and an impressive boom of +12% in London. Gains in Frankfurt were more modest at a mere +2%, while Tokyo remained depressed with average prices 5% below 1989 levels.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 84
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations except Tokyo from 1996 to 2002. Starting with the period from 1990-1995,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45144722595 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704142011834 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1355981706 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.833333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235135570891 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10800812238 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523390917894 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150166764615 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377459376984 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.