The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage change of average house prices over a period of 12 years in five cities.
It is clear that compared with the average price in 1989, most countries saw house prices decreasing between 1990 and 1995, while in the next five years four cities saw prices rising.
The average prices in the first five years decreased in New York, Tokyo, and London by 5%, 7.5%, 7.5% respectively. By contrast, house prices in Madrid and Frankfurt rose slightly by 2% and 3%.
From 1996 to 2002, the average prices changed a lot. London saw the biggest rise in house prices by 12%, followed by New York(5%). Then house prices in Madrid and Frankfurt still increased by 4% and 2%. Only Madrid and Frankfurt saw rises over the 12-year period. However, the average house price in Tokyo kept decreasing over the same period and dropped by 5% from 1996 to 2002.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- Some people believe that it s good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and giv 89
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 78
- The first below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70779220779 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21550410171 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2128541491 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5555555556 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368837088314 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178017908749 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951443501677 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265877418879 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532158326708 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.