The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the percentage changes in house prices in five big cities during the 1990-2002 period compared with those in 1989.
The first impression is that overall, there was a downward trend in figures between 1990-1995. This means that the costs of houses dropped over these years. In contrast, the 1996-2002 phase witnessed an upward tendency in general.
In particular, London, Tokyo, and New York saw their prices decrease pretty significantly, at -7.5%, -7.5%, and -5% respectively. Despite that, it costs slightly more over the years for homes in Madrid and Frankfurt, at 2% and 2.5% in the same order.
On the other hand, the most dramatic change was seen in London from 1996-2002, at 12%. The rest of the cities shared this same rising trend but the extent was not as significant. Specifically, the prices went up to 5%, 4%, and 1% in New York, Madrid, and Frankfurt. The only exception was Tokyo where homes were priced 5% lower than they were in 1989.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems 84
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, as to, in contrast, in general, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57188242826 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700598802395 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8799078725 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198469547327 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714680397484 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824676009135 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132643855782 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106402233904 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.