## The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
### summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates changes in the average cost of houses in five major cities over 13-year period from 1989.
Overall, although most house prices decreased between 1990 and 1995, all five given cities saw an upward trend in average prices from 1996 to 2002, in which London experienced the greatest changes.
Regarding the first 5 years after 1989, it is evident that average house costs in Tokyo and London dipped by around 7%, while that in New York fell down by 5%. In contrast, average houses in both Madrid and Frankfurt increased in value to approximately 2%.
Between 1996 and 2002, however, London house value soared up to around 12% in sales, which made houses in this city the most expensive. Similarly, homebuyers in New York had to pay significantly more, with house prices rising to 5% above the 1989 average, but homes in Tokyo remained cheaper than they were in 1989. Meanwhile, the cost of average houses in Madrid was double that of the previous period, whilst prices in Frankfurt remained stable.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 89
- Topic many people put their personal information online address telephone number and so on for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The number of passengers using three rail networks from 1950 to 2010
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92528735632 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36522707468 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.062093715 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348654174008 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164941404358 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514806192239 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221520699501 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391400784112 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.