The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities of the world between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average prices in 1989.
The given chart depicts the information of changes in the average prices of residence in New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt, and London from 1990 to 2002 as compare to 1989’s overall house prices.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that values of residence in London had drastic changes in the given years, While in Frankfurt, there were not big changes in the costs of houses in the given time period.
To begin with, in New York in 1990-1995 period the costs of residence were decreased to -5 percentage as compare to 1989, after 1995 to 2002 the prices were increased dramatically to +5%. In 1990 to 1995 the value of house increased around 2% and in next 6 years it also raised to 4%. 3% of surge in Frankfurt in 1990 to 1995, furthermore in 1996 to 2002 the prices of house were reduce to 1% as compare to 1989. The highest change was seen in the prices of residence in the London which was at -7% in first six years from 1990 and the prices were sharply raised to +12% in 1996 to 2002, which was the highest among all the cities. In Tokyo average value of house decreased to -7% from 1990 to 1995 and reached at -5% in next 6 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-17 | pradippatel546 | 67 | view |
- If a product is good or it meets people needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than an entertainment To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us all want to do the same and look the same Do you agree or disagree 56
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities of the world between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average prices in 1989 67
- Some people think that schools should reward the students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discus both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33488372093 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26165152137 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455813953488 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0684036408 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306712009615 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16583790332 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963734004454 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225873254888 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121267689152 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.43 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.