The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010
The line graph compares different countries in Europe in terms of using fuel in the transport sector from 2009 to 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the biggest amount of fuel was consumed by Slovakia, while the smallest was Greece. Additionally, the EU Average fuel proportion was higher than other countries except Slovakia.
In 2009, Slovakia accounted for just under 9% and it declined slightly to 6.5% after one year. By contrast, the same uptrend was witnessed in Italy and France, ending at over 5% and 4% in 2010, respectively. In 2009, the proportion of EU average was just below Slovakia and added Italy at the end of this period.
Although other countries had a fluctuation, Austria's fuel use remained stable in both years. The amount of fuel in Spain and Greece had an opposite trend. While Greece increased 1%, the population using fuel in Spain decreased 3% in 2010. The EU average was higher than 3 countries in 2009 and just below Spain in 2010.
- Do you agree or disagree that celebrities are paid far too much money 56
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- You work in a busy but poorly organised office and you are keen to be promoted Your employer needs to find a new supervisor for your department Write a letter to your employer In the letter ask to be considered for this job explain why you would be a suit 84
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82035928144 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56115281602 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.6553294774 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35695064782 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149757004982 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134781451086 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243340264561 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150849543174 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.