The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women
in a certain European country in 2007.
The bar chart illustrates information in terms of trip’s data and purpose on 5 factors: day trip, sports/ entertainment, visiting friends, shopping and traveling that European males and females traveled in the year 2007.
Generally, men took more trips than women, particularly, in day trip, men made 40 trips in 2007, while there were 25 trips made by the woman. Moreover, the trips for activities related to sporting and entertaining of men were more than the women also, by 140 trips and 120 trips, respectively.
Noticeably, the number of business trips that males traveled was approximately 330 trips - the highest number of trips for men, while the number of trips which females traveled to work was just more than 200 trips.
It is clear that women mainly enjoy visiting friends and going shopping. There were 270 trips recorded for their shopping and 205 trips for visiting friends, compared to about 200 trips for each of these purposes for men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-14 | Bhoopal Reddy | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | rucha0102 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | Sai tharun | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | baljit12 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | Cuberates | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in theyears from 2012 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canad Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 83
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 72
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make omparisons where relevant 92
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14465408805 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65864597822 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7567729471 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291530930713 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149075917298 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864218635517 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183477172916 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449170701037 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.