The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years.
The bar chart compares film production in five different countries in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Overall, country A produced the most films during the given three-year period followed by country B, while the film industry was not as strong in countries C, D, and E. The largest increase was in country B while country A experienced a small decrease and there were minimal rises in the other nations.
Leading the chart in 2007, country A produced approximately 87 movies and this figure remained unchanged the next year before decreasing to 80 in 2009. On the contrary, a reverse trend was witnessed in B’s film production. Only manufacturing 50 movies in 2007, country B produced 3 more films the next year and about 17 films in 2009, which was the most significant rise among all the countries surveyed.
With substantially lower output, countries C, D, and E were responsible for fewer than 20 movies in each year. Specifically, about 8 films were manufactured in C in the first year, before this figure increased twofold in 2008 and finally reached 18 movies in 2009. Country E also experienced an upward trend, increasing from approximately 9 films to around 12 films by the end of the period. In contrast, country D decreased sharply from around 13 films in 2007 to 8 in 2008 (the lowest number among all countries that year) before recovering to 12 films produced in 2009.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-25 | Raman Maan | 78 | view |
2019-08-01 | Omfiann | 73 | view |
2019-08-01 | Omfiann | 67 | view |
2019-05-11 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 73 | view |
2019-02-07 | yaldaasgari | 61 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
- Nowadays children are experiencing increased educational, social, and commercial pressure. What is the cause of this effect? What is a solution to reduce the pressure? 61
- The proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Malaysia and Japan is shown in the pie chart 43
- FRUUT 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. Only manufacturing 50 movies in 2007, country B produced 3 more films the next...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84453781513 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8129585284 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542016806723 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.458033415 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307706347865 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142046411735 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828803183832 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236190856629 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561955478334 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.