The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information regarding the number of people (male and female) choosing full-time and part-time education in Britain during three periods since 1970. It is immediately apparent that taking full-time education showed its superiority, in men and women, over another further education in Britain. In addition, only did the figure for the male in full-time education experience a decrease and an increase while there was a growth in male’s number of part-time education and in both educations figure for the female during the period.
Regarding the male’s interest, full-time education stood at around 1000 in 1970/71, witnessing a noticeable decline to nearly 850, and then jumped gradually to 900 at the end of the period. At the same time, part-time education saw a slight rise from about 100 –the minimum number of male’s preferable education– to 200 during the period.
Turning to the female’s chart, there was a similar pattern for full-time education and part-time education between period 1970/71 and 1990/91. While the former grew significantly, rising from nearly 700 to around 1100 – the largest number of preferable education, the latter rose gradually, before leveling of almost 200 at the end of the period.
- The bar chart below shows information about water use worldwide (Km3) from three different sectors between 1910 and 2010. 84
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 73
- Personal Statement 40
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- The pie charts show the result of a survey of children’s activities. The first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45408163265 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88818775154 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2627143099 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.714285714 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335286291883 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195201490665 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950486642789 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243980278969 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872877632318 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.