The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates information about the number of passengers who used three dominant airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000, a period of five years.

Overall, it can be seen that the number of travelers who used John F. Kennedy airport fluctuated in each year whereas LaGuardia and Newark airports showed an upward trend.

As presented in the bar, LaGuardia was the most popular airport which almost reached about 70 million people in 2000. This airport also became the most visited through the period except in 1997. In this year, John F. Kennedy was the busiest airport among the three which nearly obtain 50 million visitors to come to this airport. Newark airport showed gradual rise from 1995 until 1997. However, started from 1998 to 2000, the passengers of this airport remind steady around 42 million. In the year 1996 and 1998, John F. Kennedy also showed similarity constant traveler like Newark airport.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24146419461 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608974358974 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9786972971 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2727272727 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1818181818 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251219251652 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925191051814 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930741315933 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210465871014 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104624645945 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.