The chart below shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart gives information about the local cinema goers in 5 main categories based on their age in the year 2000.
Overall, people aged 55 and over went to the movies more than younger people did.
According to the data of the chart, the percentage of elderly people comprised more than half of the total cinema visitors. This indicated the trend of cinema watching among older people; they paid a visit to the cinema more frequently as compared to other age groups.
People who were between 31 and 45 years old showed the least interest in the cinema, so their percentage went lowest, at only 5%. Among the other three age categories (from 10 to 30), younger people expressed more concern over watching movies than adults, which was why their rate was higher than the other two. After the age of 20, the interest of going to the cinema declined yet increased dramatically when people became over 50 as shown in the chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-27 | Taytor2609 | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- School should not force children learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67878787879 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24883604216 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2748669538 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168003524875 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897799780647 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699064309962 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120262378371 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797257110037 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.