The bar graph provides information about the number of incidents and injuries every 100 million passenger miles travelled of five means of transportation in 2002.
In general, over half of the incidents resulted in physical damages. Demand response stood out among the five transportation types with far more incidents and injuries than the others.
The graph indicated that demand response held the first place in the number of incidents with 250 per 100 PMT, followed by light rail and bus, both standing at approximately 80 per 100 million PMT. Heavy rail and commuter rail were slightly safer than light rail and bus, with the former witnessing 50 incidents per 100 million PMT and the latter experiencing just as half.
In terms of injuries, demand response still surpassed the rest by a large margin. Bus and commuter rail users were also more injury-prone than the remaining two, with over three quarters of the accidents culminating in damages. Heavy rail caused about 40 injuries per 100 million PMT and although light rail had the second most incidents, only half of them resulted in injuries.
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at leas 73
- People in all modern societies use drugs, but today's youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasingly early age. Some sociologists claim that parents an do there members of society often set a bad example.Discuss the caus 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, still, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64632748326 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2520339747 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240330766847 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111273479763 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994400928733 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171479671155 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946647673391 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.