The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006.
The given chart elucidates the information about the proportion of grown-ups from diverse age categories connecting to the Internet on a daily basis in the UK between 2003 and 2006. As illustrated by the chart, the percentage of adults using the Internet everyday witnessed an upward pattern and when people got older, the utilization of the Internet seemed to hold less attraction. Also of note is that the highest figure belonged to the age bracket 16-24 in the year 2005.
It is evident that in the first year, the data for Internet users aged from 16 to 24 stood at 80%, which was roughly twice as high as that of the 45-54 year-olds. Meanwhile, exactly a half of the respondents between 25 and 44 indicated that they made an access to the Internet everyday compared with a lower figure for the age group 55-64, at 30%. Another notable feature is that no figure was demonstrated for the participants aged 65+ in 2003.
Looking at more details, the Internet users aged from 25-44 underwent a remarkable rise from 45% to approximately 80% in 2006. There also existed a consistent growth by roughly 20% from 60% in 2003 for the 45-54 year olds. The other age brackets establishing connection to the Internet namely 16-24, 55-64 and 65+ generally witnessed slight climbs despite some erratic patterns throughout the investigated period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011. 78
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The graphs below show four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported in thousand tonnes in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nternet seemed to hold less attraction. Also of note is that the highest figure belo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the age bracket 16-24 in the year 2005. It is evident that in the first year, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ween 25 and 44 indicated that they made an access to the Internet everyday compared with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...hat they made an access to the Internet everyday compared with a lower figure for the ag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ails, the Internet users aged from 25-44 underwent a remarkable rise from 45% to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96035242291 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72028482755 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599118942731 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3559286447 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304161979031 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120158000539 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712358649578 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213910215322 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833921035979 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.