Depicted in the graph is the percentage of residents of Boston and Seattle, holding no sort of health insurance. This data has been collected over an interval of 25 years (from 1981 t0 2005).
By the year 1981, the percentage of people deprived of health insurance for both cities was a little above 20 percent. During the next 10 years ( from 1981 to 1989) this rate experienced a relatively steady growth for Seattle, reaching an all-time peak of 40 percent. Meanwhile, for Boston the trend experienced a reversed pattern, plumming it down to 20 percent.
The line graph representing Seattle steadily sinks in the course of the next 16 years (from 1989 to 2005), to reach 20 percent once more. The trend for Boston, however, stages a rather erratic behavior by reaching a record high of approximately 35 percent. Afterward, it witnesses a notable decrease to about 2 percent by the year 2005.
In conclusion, the chart provides data which shows during a 25-year period, the city population of Boston with no health insurance dropped from 20 percent to 2 percent. On the contrary, the same trend for Seattle beginning with 20 percent, at the end of the featured 25-year course, despite a surge in 1989, reached its start point 20 percent once again.
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (high acid levels are measured by low pH values).Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 78
- Some people think it is more important to spend time in developing a successful career while others think it is more important to spend time with friends and family.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
- This chart below shows the percentage of the city's population that does not have any sort of health insurance. there is information from 1981 to 2005 for two cities 78
- Some people think it is more important to spend time in developing a successful career while others think it is more important to spend time with friends and family Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove 20 percent. During the next 10 years from 1981 to 1989 this rate experienced ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in conclusion, sort of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85514018692 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64430247422 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1197889794 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201421043538 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927517666661 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635573443187 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138771657159 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054978164968 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.