The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how employed adults spent their day in a particular country over a 50-year period.
It can be clearly seen from the chart that people who got a job used most of their time to work and sleep. In addition, staying at home seemed to be the best option for relaxing among working individuals.
In 1958, the amount of time for working accounted for 33%, which was roughly similar with that for sleeping, at 32%. Subsequently, there was a significant rise of 42% of the percentage of day for working while the figure for sleeping went down by around 10% in 2008. Moreover, the proportion of time to commute to work also rose from 2% to 8%.
Employers devoted 19% of their time to hanging out with friends and family, compared to 8% and 6%, which was the figure for relaxing at home and other, respectively. Fifty years later, there was a reverse with the trend, the percentage of time for hanging out fell dramatically by 13%, while that for staying at home to relax increased to 13%, and the figure for other remained stable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 73
- In some countries there has been an increase in the number if parents choosing to self educate their children at home rather than sending them to school Do the advantages of home education outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62765957447 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50581035976 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9621926815 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106128814207 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583329043424 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055616094364 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086351117823 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644188133773 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.