The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the proportion of England and Wales families living in owned and rented house from 1918 and 2011.

Overal, households renting accomodation overwhelmed the number over the half of the period; however, during the
rest period, households owning houses dominated the number.

Households in rented houses started at nearly 80 percent in 1918 before decreasing to around 70 percent in 1939 and
then remained stable till 1953. From that, the percentage stably went down approximately 10 percent each 10 years to
about 30 percent in 1991 and then kept unchanged till 2011 before starting to slightly rise around 5 percent in 2011.

On the other hand, households in owned accomodation stood at a lower point around 23 percent in 1918. After that, the
percentage rose 10 percent in the next 21 years and then stayed unchanged untill 1953. From 1953 to 1991, there was the
10-percent stable climb in the number of households each 10 years to nearly 70 percent and then was an insignificant rise
in 2001. Over the last 10 years period, the number slightly went down to approximately 65 percent.

Finally, households owning and renting houses from 1918 to 2011 were two opposite trends. They met each other in 1971
when the two ratios were both at 50 percent.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... half of the period; however, during the rest period, households owning houses do...
^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasing to around 70 percent in 1939 and then remained stable till 1953. From tha...
^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pproximately 10 percent each 10 years to about 30 percent in 1991 and then kept u...
^^^
Line 10, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound 23 percent in 1918. After that, the percentage rose 10 percent in the next 2...
^^^
Line 11, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l 1953. From 1953 to 1991, there was the 10-percent stable climb in the number of...
^^^
Line 12, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcent and then was an insignificant rise in 2001. Over the last 10 years period, ...
^^^
Line 15, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...site trends. They met each other in 1971 when the two ratios were both at 50 perc...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05140186916 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57532602429 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3459792483 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147597557195 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808023979594 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791024444956 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715438076091 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700960226178 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.