the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The column chart illustrates differences in the proportion of home ownership and occupants renting housing in England and Wales from 1981 to 2011.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the proportion of accommodation owned by households, while the opposite was true for that of renting place of residence over the period shown. It is also noticeable that the figures for both categories were equally represented in the year 1971.
At the beginning of the period, the percentage of houses owned by families was just one – third of the figure for people rented houses, which was nearly 25 per cent. However, the gap appeared to be narrowed over a period of 53 years until 1971, the proportion of households renting and owing accommodation coincided, at exactly 50%.
Since then, the figure for home ownership experienced a gradual increase, in comparison with a moderate decline in the proportion of residents renting houses from 1981 to 2001. Despite a slight fall of approximately 5%, the rate of households owned accommodation was still higher than that of occupants renting dwellings, which only made up relatively 35% at the end of the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- the pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year2010. 56
- The chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 61
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07368421053 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88171232568 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.7979591138 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154293943782 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741068961779 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439749375034 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104129311068 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359661149981 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.