The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011.
The line graph gives information about changes in the proportions of people going to cinema once a month or more, divided into four different age groups in one country in Europe during the period between 2000 and 2011.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the percentages of all age groups over the given period. It is also clear that the figure for those between 15 and 24 years old was higher compared to the others.
In the year 2000, around 15% of people at the age of 15 to 24 went to the cinema. Afterward, its figure experienced upward fluctuations, reaching 50% in 2007 before decreasing to about 35% in 2008. In the following three years, there was a remarkable increase to 52% at the end of the period.
In comparison, the percentage of those aged 7 to 14 started at 10% which was nearly twice as high as that of the 25 to 35 age group. Then, the figures for these two groups saw similar patterns, fluctuating constantly and reaching 30% in 2011. Over the same period, the proportion of people who were 35 and over went up gradually from roughly 2% to approximately 12% within 11 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | huong789 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | kiran sanghera | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | Phạm Thùy Linh | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- You and some friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion and you were very pleased with the food and service 89
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- Your town council has decided to demolish an historic building due to lack of funds to renovate Write a letter to your counselor In your letter you should say why it is important to preserve the historic building how the funds could be generated 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to approximately 12% within 11 years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.565 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5553424428 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0295531604 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29605573839 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104339085866 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10691973057 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175202931169 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109510200082 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.