The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009.
The table gives information about changes in the weight of men and women, divided into three categories, in Vietnam during the period from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the proportions of men and women who were at normal weight, whereas the figure for overweight people experienced a reverse pattern. It is also clear that there was no change in underweight women compared to a slight decrease in men.
In 1999, 43% of Vietnamese females had normal body weight, followed by that of males, at 48%. In the following ten years, the percentages of these two groups increased gradually to 56% for the former and 54% for the latter.
Overweight women accounted for 28% in the first period before decreasing about twofold to 15% in the next decade. In comparison, there was also a steady drop of 3% in both overweight and underweight men, from 26% to 23%. Over the given period, the rate of Vietnamese females who were underweight remained stable at 29%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-13 | denistran85 | 79 | view |
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 56
- The graph below shows the sales of Adult s fiction Children s books and Education s books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 89
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 90
- The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 78
- You and some friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion and you were very pleased with the food and service Write a letter to the restaurant manager In your letter give details of your visit to the restaurant explain the reason for 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85119047619 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62147479523 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5972711513 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175415857991 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737050336303 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884203497853 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11878474817 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09814164226 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.