The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more between 1984 and 2003.
The chart reveals changes in the proportion of people going to the cinema once a month or more based on the four different age groups during a 20-year-period. Overall, all categories witnessed an upward trend despite some fluctuation over the time surveyed.
It can be seen that the rate of 15-to-24-year-old people visiting the cinema group always possessed the highest position. To be exact, the figure for this stayed well beyond the others, accounting for 15% in the first year and then reached a peak of approximately 52% in the last year after experiencing a significant fluctuation. By contrast, that for moviegoers who are over 35 years old possessed the lowest rate among all categories, increasing from roughly 3% in 1984 to a peak of over 10% in 2003.
There was a remarkable growth in the proportion of people aged 25-35 which its figure fluctuated noticeably before reaching the highest point at 30%. Regarding the rate of 25-35-year-old moviegoers, although possessing a higher figure during an 18-year-period, this percentage decreased to an equal low compared with the category of “25-35 age group”, at 30%.
- The chart show the expenditure of two countries on comsumer goods in 2010 11
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more between 1984 and 2003 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in writing formal academic essay for particular university course Describe the stages of the process in a reporter a university lecturer You should write at least 150 words Syerapke 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16304347826 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1531295403 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663043478261 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.182461716 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187611521885 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917133711951 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106269810465 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135732158886 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772724440609 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.