The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006
The bar chart reveals changes in the amount of money earned from selling various sorts of digital games from 2000 to 2006 globally (measured in billions of dollars). Overall, the revenue from all categories witnessed an upward trend except for console games. Additionally, handled games were the most used types of games during these time surveyed.
It can be seen that the figure for handheld games increased by about 6 billion dollars, from nearly 12 billion dollars in the first year to 18 billion dollars in the last year, which possessed the highest popularity. Appearing one year afterward, the revenue from online games rose steadily between roughly 2 billion dollars in 2001 and 10 billion dollars in 2006. Similarly, there was significant growth in the income from mobile phone games although this category was not available until 2002, with its figure witnessed a three-time increase from about 2 billion dollars to 7 billion dollars. By contrast, the amount of money earned from selling console games showed a downward trend, reducing a half from 6 billion to 3 billion dollars over the period time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information about US government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 50
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more between 1984 and 2003 89
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08743169399 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45333892244 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3039739575 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306875074156 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149293750278 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812592220916 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235598623175 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00770217567106 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.