Many of the cities are currently facing a serious housing shortage. What are some of the reasons for this shortage and what solutions can you suggest?
Nowadays, lacking accommodation in cities has become an increasing phenomenon globally. Resulting in this problem, there are several reasons involved. However, I do also believe that the decrease in housing can be tackled with some suitable solutions.
Firstly, overpopulation is the root of the growth of housing demand. This is because the population nowadays is out of the government’s control, keeping going up at an alarming rate while our Earth remains its size stable with a maximum quantity of land. Secondly, this issue is also attributed to the tendency of people’s migration. Those in the countrysides, in detail, are willing to move to the metropolis to search for better job prospects and house-hunting. Thirdly, the lack of land is one of the causes drives in the shortage of housing options. To be exact, land which is finite is now used for various development purposes. Some construction companies, for instance, proposing to destroy residents’ houses to build entertainment centers, factories, and skyscrapers.
On the contrary, government intervention is essential in dealing with this housing crisis. One of the most efficient solutions could be reducing the gap in the population between rural areas and urban ones. This suggestion can be conducted by taking the economic potential of suburban fully and restricting residents’ movement to the city. Additionally, instead of establishing detached houses that take up a lot of land, the government can construct land-efficient models of public buildings such as halls of residents, apartment blocks, or complexes where numerous citizens can live together.
To conclude, the scarcity of accommodation is becoming more and more noticeable on a global scale. With these aforementioned ideas, I cite that this housing crisis is resulted from several causes and could be solved by suggested solutions.
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 52
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart show the expenditure of two countries on comsumer goods in 2010 11
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51557093426 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20037593127 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63321799308 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.824508296 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207942114667 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627766776843 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333354867422 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116856833006 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031584427362 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51557093426 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20037593127 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63321799308 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.824508296 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207942114667 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627766776843 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333354867422 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116856833006 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031584427362 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.