The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts reveal changes in the proportion of the 60-64s in two genders who have jobs in four different countries in the two separate years, 1970 and 2000. Overall, there was a downward trend in both genders, among which males always dominated higher value than females during these years surveyed.
In 1970, the rate of working men and women in the USA outnumbered others, making up 86% and 78% respectively. This was closely followed by that of those in Indonesia, which male consists of 84% and female consist of 65%. The figure for men and women having jobs in the remaining countries was similar, standing at an average of 76% for the former and 60% for the latter.
After 30 years, the percentage of working males continued its highest figure among all, at 78% while that of females fell to 45%. A close value can be seen in the figure for Japan and Indonesia, in which 55% belonged to men and 62% belonged to women on average. There was a relatively large gap between the proportion of those in Belgium with the figure for males being approximately seven times compared with that for females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-11 | hoanghihi1234 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 52
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 10
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 84
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69743589744 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43055284117 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6687410629 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117960307554 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531759433176 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546005807308 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843753246411 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347235875303 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.